Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliffjumper
Matt Moylan's a pretty difficult person to like, isn't he? Same sort of Mad Brick "we went along with it at the time for the money, now we're not getting any we're going to speak up" vibe.
|
There's certainly some overly emotive stuff in there, pitching for the
GI Joe licence when it was coming up for renewal is hardly "stealing" it, and indeed that's how IDW got it isn't it? Considering the big success both Joes and TF had enjoyed with the initial relaunch I doubt they were the only small publisher who had a punt with the licence ending.
And would Hasbro have really been bothered with both properties being at
Dreamwave? They don't seem to have had a huge amount more freedom than IDW, and the only real "Power" they had over the franchise other than their own books was Hasbro and Takara using their art on the reissue boxes. Which only stopped in Takara's case with the dropping of the book design, not the change of publisher. I suspect Devil's Due kept it simply because the Joe book had been a great success and there wasn't much point in breaking up a winning partnership.
EDIT: Though the "We don't want both at one publisher" thing could have just been the official reason/brush off Hasbro gave Dreamwave I suppose.
I think the Red Alert thing had previously been confirmed by Mad Brick, though the explanation of the substitution art is new and surprisingly well done. Though as you say, why put him in book 2?
Oh, and "Correcting characters eye colours", as just keeping them consistent from issue to issue wouldn't require a fan in residence why do I have a terrible feeling it was to go for the blue/good red/evil cartoon combo?
I'm also dubious as to how many people didn't know they were ghosting for Lee, of the various names mentioned It's only Milne who seems to have been caught unaware. Or at least the only person bothered enough to complain after the fact.
As for War Within.... Hey, Grimlock wasn't dead! Who'd have thunk it?