Is this movie rated yet?

redman prime · Post by **redman prime** » Sun May 27, 2007 3:39 pm

seeing as it comes out in about a month, I figured it would have a rating assigned to it, but on everything I've seen, still has the tag of "not yet rated."

Is this still the case?

another tf fan · Post by **another tf fan** » Mon May 28, 2007 2:34 am

the Pontiac ad showed the rating as pg-13.

I'm pretty certain that is the rating.

Megan Fox gets a XXX from me, though.

redman prime · Post by **redman prime** » Mon May 28, 2007 6:41 pm

Originally posted by another tf fan
the Pontiac ad showed the rating as pg-13.

I'm pretty certain that is the rating.

Megan Fox gets a XXX from me, though.

i hadn't seen anything, but i was going on the assumption that it would be a PG-13 flick.

Megan fox is pretty foxy pardon the bad pun.

redman prime · Post by **redman prime** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:52 pm

I've got a commercial on right now that still doesn't have a rating on it, but it did say july 3rd.

are they trying to screw with us still?
and what happens if they end up slapping an "R" on this badboy?

Sir Auros · Post by **Sir Auros** » Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:22 am

It's PG-13. The Transformers lunchables commercials keep mentioning that. I guess they have to since it's a product marketed towards kids, but promoting a movie with a not-so-kid-friendly rating.

redman prime · Post by **redman prime** » Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:54 am

I am still of that impression, but haven't seen the actual movie spots showing a rating...
but the same is going with die hard 4, which means that "yippie kay-aye-mother****er" is possibly pg-13.

just name it already!

and saw a new trailer, pretty neat.

Sir Auros · Post by **Sir Auros** » Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:30 am

It is rated PG-13.

Halfshell · Post by **Halfshell** » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:34 pm

Dammit. I was seriously hoping for an R18 certificate being applied to this film designed to sell toys to small children...

Post by **inflatable dalek** » Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:45 pm

Originally posted by Brendocon
Dammit. I was seriously hoping for an R18 certificate being applied to this film designed to sell toys to small children...

Well, R18's often involve toys of some sort. I'm sure I saw Scattershot in one once...

redman prime · Post by **redman prime** » Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:38 am

Even last night i had seen commercials still saying not rated, but saw it tonight that everyone was right.

although you could only see Scattershot's legs in that movie I saw... weird.

*BARRAGE* · Post by ***BARRAGE*** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:42 am

The trailer versions on TV are actually version 3 or 4... 5 has only been released to theaters currently for some reason, and is the only with a finalised rateing... but as i work at a movie theater and have had to replace the old tailers with the current updates, i can assure you of the PG-13 rating...

Hawkeye · Post by **Hawkeye** » Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:02 am

Originally posted by Brendocon
Dammit. I was seriously hoping for an R18 certificate being applied to this film designed to sell toys to small children...

terminator 2 and robocop.

although you are still right, its just i always found it funny that those two films were marketed to kids through toys.