Maximum Dinobots teasers (Nick Roche art) / Simon Furman interview at Comic Book Resources

Comics, cartoons, movies and fan stuff.
User avatar
Denyer
Posts: 33039
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 4:00 am
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Maximum Dinobots teasers (Nick Roche art) / Simon Furman interview at Comic Book Resources

Post by Denyer »

Update: Furman interview at Comic Book Resources --

http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=19100

Quickie before I head off to work...

http://idwpublishing.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=5018

Image

More teasers in this week following and next!
User avatar
MeGrimlock
Protoform
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2001 4:00 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by MeGrimlock »

It's available on Deviant Art too (and I'm placing here a link, just because I love this image :) ) :
Image

There is so much energy in this art. And I know I'm going to love the story.
User avatar
Blackjack
Posts: 9112
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 1:04 pm

Post by Blackjack »

OooOOoooooOOooh!

I think I'm gonna love Maxie Dinos. Was reading the Marvel reprints when I came into this thread. Between the rest of IDW's input (Stormbringer, EJ Su and Nick Roche come to mind) and this, the artwork of TFs have really gone far. Gonna love this series...

Unless it causes more continuity problems, of course. :p:p
User avatar
MeGrimlock
Protoform
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2001 4:00 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Day 2

Post by MeGrimlock »

The new teaser is panel one of page 2 (just panel one):

Image
Cliffjumper
Posts: 32206
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am

Post by Cliffjumper »

"Maximum mayhem"? Stan Lee writing this one?
User avatar
inflatable dalek
Posts: 24000
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: Kidderminster UK

Post by inflatable dalek »

He could only be an improvement on the recent Furman?McCarthy outtput.

Great art from Roche, lets hope that unlike Sideswipe the pwetty pictures aren't a desperate attempt to polish a turd of a script.
User avatar
MeGrimlock
Protoform
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2001 4:00 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by MeGrimlock »

Slag and Sludge:
Image Image
User avatar
Halfshell
Posts: 19167
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 am
Location: Don't complain to me. I don't care.
Contact:

Post by Halfshell »

inflatable dalek wrote:Great art from Roche, lets hope that unlike Sideswipe the pwetty pictures aren't a desperate attempt to polish a turd of a script.
I think the phrases "Dynobots woz ere" and "we came, we saw, we trampled" may contain an indication re the answer...
Cliffjumper
Posts: 32206
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am

Post by Cliffjumper »

Aye... the worst bit is these are considered the kind of lines to get everyone amped about the thing. "Me Grimlock Badass" all over again.

What's the difference between Furman and McCarthy that had us all so wound up again?
User avatar
inflatable dalek
Posts: 24000
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: Kidderminster UK

Post by inflatable dalek »

Perhaps it'll turn out the Dynobots first woke up in Roman times to give Tacticus (hopefully I've not muddled him with the Discworld version) that quote so it isn't a horribly anachronistic crap attempt to be funny? No?
Cliffjumper
Posts: 32206
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am

Post by Cliffjumper »

Well, either you've got the Roman one wrong (Tacitus) or you've got the real Tacticus' race wrong (both were Greek). Asterix guest-star Julie C was the man who nailed the actual quote. Still, it was a good joke so I'll let it ride.
User avatar
inflatable dalek
Posts: 24000
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: Kidderminster UK

Post by inflatable dalek »

Cliffjumper wrote:Asterix guest-star Julie C was the man who nailed the actual quote.
Was that the same night he did the "fisting Normon Lamont" gag? Actually,l I'd pay good money if the Dynobots used that quote instead...
User avatar
zigzagger
Posts: 3453
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:40 am

Post by zigzagger »

Already mentioned this in the Comic Hub, but here goes...
Chris Ryall has posted a 5-page preview on his blog.

Touch it. It's "Dino-mite" according to the blog entry.
Cliffjumper
Posts: 32206
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am

Post by Cliffjumper »

I trust Ryall, he's never been one to resort to hyperbole to sell mediocre comics.
User avatar
inflatable dalek
Posts: 24000
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: Kidderminster UK

Post by inflatable dalek »

Couldn't most of that have been covered by the recap page?
User avatar
Denyer
Posts: 33039
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 4:00 am
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Post by Denyer »

Cliffjumper wrote:What's the difference between Furman and McCarthy that had us all so wound up again?
With a story like this, a different flavour of nostalgia.

More generally, Furman doesn't tend to put his foot in things when in public, and there's some substance beyond kewl kwotes and fight scenes. He also tends to build on earlier work, however gnarly the connections get, rather than throw it out of the window because he can't be bothered.
Cliffjumper
Posts: 32206
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am

Post by Cliffjumper »

Like when he switched to the US book and didn't just junk the Cybertronian stuff he'd spent years on in the UK series despite there being every opportunity to bring it in and not have Cybertron be the size of a football with a population of nine, right?

I'd argue the substance > kewl quotes ratio has declined considerably, as has the substance > kewl concept ratio ("Let's tell the world what I think of female Autobots!" "Why, what does it have to do with the story?" "**** you, I want to tell the world what I think of female Autobots!").

Plus that really is some awful dialogue, and it's quite worrying that frames of the Dinobots (sorry, Dynobots...) smashing shit up and spouting banal crap is being chosen to push this...
User avatar
Denyer
Posts: 33039
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 4:00 am
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Post by Denyer »

Cliffjumper wrote:Like when he switched to the US book and didn't just junk the Cybertronian stuff he'd spent years on in the UK series despite there being every opportunity to bring it in and not have Cybertron be the size of a football with a population of nine, right?
It's established by Xaaron that he still has a resistance, ergo Cybertron still has some kind of population. A few months from cancellation and with the requirement to get ActionMasters into the comic isn't really the time to start going "hey, you remember The Smelting Pool and other stray glimpses of Cybertron? there might be some kind of society still existing top-side rather than digging as far into the planet as it can as fast as it can, and I want to show you it..."

Bringing Xaaron across was a start, and had a sudden wrap not been called for we might have seen the resistance brought out of the depths. Or the intention may have been that most were killed by the pointy mechs (that was a rather weak side-plot to have started up, as was spending an issue tying off Galvatron rather than just calling him dead.)

The concept book (Revelation, Expansion, etc) got cancelled -- Maximum Dinobots is unlikely to be much more than a knock-around title, and if does turn out to be more than that I'll be quite happy.
User avatar
Halfshell
Posts: 19167
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 am
Location: Don't complain to me. I don't care.
Contact:

Post by Halfshell »

inflatable dalek wrote:Couldn't most of that have been covered by the recap page?
Do the recap blurbs get carried over to the trades?
User avatar
inflatable dalek
Posts: 24000
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: Kidderminster UK

Post by inflatable dalek »

Halfshell wrote:Do the recap blurbs get carried over to the trades?
Is there any reason they couldn't put one in the trade?
Post Reply