Apparently, in Scrabble-land, the following are words...
Apparently, in Scrabble-land, the following are words...
...et, re, er and not merely f*cking abbreviations which are supposed to be against the f*cking rules...
Stupid online scrabble...
Stupid online scrabble...
- Plasmodium
- Posts: 7580
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2002 5:00 am
- Location: Canada
- Sixswitch
- Posts: 8295
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2001 5:00 am
- Location: Sent to outer space, to find another happy place.
- Contact:
Originally posted by Redstreak
Well...
Et is the past tense of eat.
It is? I always thought that was 'ate'. Is this an American only spelling?
-Ss
I found God. Then I lost him. He'll probably turn up down the back of the sofa someday.
"The early bird gets the worm, but the early worm is ****ed."
"I'm not oppressing you Stan, but you haven't got a womb. Where's the fetus going to gestate? You going to keep it in a box?"
- Savannahtron
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2001 5:00 am
Originally posted by Redstreak
Check a Scrabble dictionary, Hound...
Why? Does "Scrabble" get to make up new meanings and new words at whim? I don't see why there is a need for a "Scrabble dictionary". If the word "et" exists, then why isn't it in a regular dictionary? Now, I'm no expert of the english language so I could be wrong. I only checked dictionary.com out of passing interest. I'd actually like to know the origin of the word "et" as a past tense form of eat if it is indeed that. Educate me...
1921\4\6-2010\1\21 Goodbye Grandma, I love you
Key thing to remember is there are several dictionaries...Oxford's and Webster's, for starters...if the meaning can be found in any accredited dictionary, it goes in with Scrabble unless it's an abbreviation or has excess punctuation. You'll note...Oxford recognizes "D'oh" as a word, but Webster's does not. That's a prime example.