Warcry wrote:The originals are far from cinematic perfection, I agree. But they're fun, and they don't take themselves too seriously. When they're bad, they're bad in entertaining ways. But the prequels are pretentious, they're boring at stretches, and when they're bad they're bad in a way that only a creator who's bought his own publicity and thinks that he can do no wrong can be bad.
I actually think Attack of the Clones is a fairly good movie, all things considered. But The Phantom Menace is just dreadful, an utter borefest full of terrible acting, dull action sequences, bad CGI and a plot so detached from everything else with the "Star Wars" label on it that you'd never guess that's what it was until you saw a lightsaber. And I can say that with full confidence because I actually just finished watching it not ten minutes before writing this comment (my wife, who'd never seen it before and really wanted to watch it, fell asleep about half-way through). And in spite of owning the DVD I honestly think I've only seen Revenge of the Sith once, so I can't say too much about that one other than that it was so dull that I've really never had much interest in watching it for a second time.
Ah, got it. It's just that when most people criticized the prequels, it's mostly of the "Rape My Childhood" variety that doesn't really have any intellectual quality.
Though I have a few points of my own to add.
1) I don't think any moment in the Originals are truly bad, but then again, I'm just a pleb:sweatdrop
2) Palpatine was awesome in the Prequels. I mean, he totally set the entire galaxy against each other. And his "I am the Senate!" line was more epic than anything Shane McCarthy can come up with:)