[Toy Design] Complexity or Simplicity
- Skidmark
- Posts: 954
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:49 pm
- Location: In your base, stealing your flag
- Contact:
[Toy Design] Complexity or Simplicity
What do you prefer in a transformer toy? A complex transformation scheme like the Movie line? Or the simple transformations like the Animated line?
"Some people are like slinkies, not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs."
Movies I've seen recently:
Red
Johnny Got His Gun
A Clockwork Orange
Fight Club
Toy Story 3
Zombieland
Tenacious D The Pick of destiny
Watchmen
Movies I've seen recently:
Red
Johnny Got His Gun
A Clockwork Orange
Fight Club
Toy Story 3
Zombieland
Tenacious D The Pick of destiny
Watchmen
- Energon Hot Shot
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:22 pm
- Location: Texas
- Treadshot A1
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:49 am
- Contact:
Yeah, same here. I don't mind if it's simple, or complex, but this is on the terms that neither will hinder transformation in any way, or make pieces pop off.
Galvatron is a perfect example of where complexity went wrong. I think Topspin and Twin Twist get the prize for Simplicity gone wrong.
This is where Complexity was used correctly: http://www.toyking.com.tw/image/toy/ban ... 503htm.jpg
EDIT: Why has this been moved?
Galvatron is a perfect example of where complexity went wrong. I think Topspin and Twin Twist get the prize for Simplicity gone wrong.
This is where Complexity was used correctly: http://www.toyking.com.tw/image/toy/ban ... 503htm.jpg
EDIT: Why has this been moved?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
- Posts: 32206
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am
- Transformer Kamen
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:55 am
I like somewhat complex transformations. Have the fun of a transformer is figuring out how all the little bits shift around. On the other hand, I hate figures that have little bits that have to be fiddled into a precise configuration when a single piece would have worked only slight less well; but then that's usually only a few minutes of frustration when I first transform the figure, so it ends up not being a big deal anyway.
- Detective Barricade
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Middle of Nowhere, Canada
- RID Scourge
- Posts: 13262
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2001 4:00 am
- Location: In ur newz forum. Reading ur newz!
I second that. While I appreciate all the detail and work that goes into a complex transformation, I don't want it to be a hassle for me to transform it. Usually that makes me leave the TF in one mode or another and very rarely transform him. I've been a fan of the Classics/Universe transformations so far... Not too complex, not too simple, but fun (with the exception of pain-in-the-ass Galvatron).RID Scourge wrote:I'm big on the "Keep it simple, stupid" maxim. I prefer the transformers that I can fiddle with while I'm watching a movie or using the internet.
Either way, I think fun rules over complexity or simplicity. It's all in design.
- The Reverend
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 6:26 am
- Location: Knoxville, TN
I do think fun should trump both complex or simple for their own sakes. However, it would be a bit of a disappointment for something the size of Primus to be as simple as something like Windcharger.
-
- Posts: 32206
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am
Another vote for "I don't give a damn as long as it works". That said, I have to agree with Clay, toys need to have some sort of complexity relative to their size. An awful lot of Transformers don't do this - practically all the Unicron Trilogy figures were around 25% larger than the designs merited, same with... well, just about every single toy that was actually designed for Generation 1. And some of the ones they nicked from Diaclone (shitbox F-15 mould, I'm looking at you...). Recent lines, such as the Movie stuff or Classics/Universe, have cranked this back a bit, though the last couple of years of G2, RiD and the Beast series deserve a tip of the hat for really finding the balance.
Needlessly complicated transformations really piss me off, generally - Alternators and Masterpiece both make far too much effort out of simple transformations.
Needlessly complicated transformations really piss me off, generally - Alternators and Masterpiece both make far too much effort out of simple transformations.
It's easy to have clear instructions when every one of them is just "Push in arms, fold up legs, flip down head, put on all the parts that make it look like a vehicle."The Reverend wrote:I would enjoy complex transformations more if the quality and format of TF instructions hadn't gone down so severely since G1.
In all seriousness, though, I'm actually pretty impressed with the instructions of late, especially after getting some BW stuff with instructions. For the most part, the modern instructions are pretty clear and break it down step by step instead of trying to jam 5 actions into one frame. And I like how most of the time it's easy to see the exact joint that needs to be moving due to the coloring of the instructions.
- secretcode
- Posts: 3717
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:50 pm
- Contact:
I could care less about Transformations. From Flipchangers (BW Rattrap is still one of my favs) to Holy-Shit-I'm-Going-To-Stab-Aaron-Archer Insane (I had no problems with Universe Galvatron, I'm talking more along the lines of Alt. Prime's puzzle like Robot to Vehicle) I find most of them enjoyable except for the Spychangers/G2 Gobots.
-
- Posts: 32206
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 5:00 am
- secretcode
- Posts: 3717
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:50 pm
- Contact:
Clearance issues are what quickly push a transformation from the "fun" column to the "frustrating" column for me. When, halfway through the transformation there are a bunch of parts dangling all over the place and you have to work some parts past other parts and there isn't quite enough room. Yes Universe Galvatron.
I have to vote "simple."
I have to vote "simple."
- Summerhayes
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:50 pm
- Location: Nagano, Japan
- Skidmark
- Posts: 954
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:49 pm
- Location: In your base, stealing your flag
- Contact:
I'm the type of guy who likes a transformer that's complex but not too complex to where you have to look at the manual for almost every step. I also hate it when you have to actually force(bend or stretch or overpower)some piece of kibble go somewhere.
"Some people are like slinkies, not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs."
Movies I've seen recently:
Red
Johnny Got His Gun
A Clockwork Orange
Fight Club
Toy Story 3
Zombieland
Tenacious D The Pick of destiny
Watchmen
Movies I've seen recently:
Red
Johnny Got His Gun
A Clockwork Orange
Fight Club
Toy Story 3
Zombieland
Tenacious D The Pick of destiny
Watchmen
- Treadshot A1
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:49 am
- Contact:
Oh, sorry. I thought it was moved from toys to media. Didn't realise it was the other way round.Cliffjumper wrote:Because it's about toys. Bloody Hell, you're getting worse I think.
I have to agree with the whole "fun beats transformations" thing. I think Classics 1 was pretty good at this.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]