Revenge of the Fallen SPOILER discussion thread - expect SPOILERS inside!

Tramp · Post by **Tramp** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:34 am

TURBO CHARGER wrote:Slingshot was kicked out of the Aerialbots?

More than likely, it was that Hasbro couldn't trademark the name.

secretcode · Post by **secretcode** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:11 am

Starfield wrote:
SPOILER! (select to read)
The villain is Vamp. No mistake.

SPOILER! (select to read)
Gobots have technically Fallen...

Rattrap's tail · Post by **Rattrap's tail** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 7:16 pm

SPOILER! (select to read)
I think the Fallen is waaay to good to be a Gobot.

Brimstone · Post by **Brimstone** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:32 pm

Rattrap's tail wrote:
SPOILER! (select to read)
I think the Fallen is waaay to good to be a Gobot.

"Are you on drugs?"

electro girl · Post by **electro girl** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:51 pm

Brimstone wrote:"Are you on drugs?"

He's the only sane person alive, ya big freak ball.

Brimstone · Post by **Brimstone** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:30 am

electro girl wrote:He's the only sane person alive, ya big freak ball.

I don't think that's the next line....

(Sorry...just watched TF last night and I love that scene...makes me laugh. "Okay, fill'er up, and no drippy, drippy.")

Rattrap's tail · Post by **Rattrap's tail** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:17 pm

Brimstone wrote:"Are you on drugs?"

No. I only think that if there's gonna be a Fallen it has to be based on a TF. Not on something TF like that has been made by Bandai.

Springer145 · Post by **Springer145** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:07 pm

...On topic or not, for better or for worse, this thread provides me with hours of entertainment

Thank you select few that may or may not know who you are haha

secretcode · Post by **secretcode** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:21 pm

Rattrap's tail wrote:No. I only think that if there's gonna be a Fallen it has to be based on a TF. Not on something TF like that has been made by Bandai.

...Sigh.

Two things: #1- THEY ARE JOKES!, #2- Gobots are now Hasbro's property.

secretcode · Post by **secretcode** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:20 pm

New Images are up of the majority of the Autobots on the road.
http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/oo13 ... 00x240.jpg
http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/oo13 ... 00x225.jpg

SPOILER! (select to read)
Personally, I'm disappointed in the lack of "Arcee" and Ratchet.

Rattrap's tail · Post by **Rattrap's tail** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:44 pm

SPOILER! (select to read)
Hmmm That´s strange/nice. It´s nice to see that in just a week before the trailer comes out(1 february, start of the Superbowl) that we now finnally get some nice snazzy details. On the other hand, secret-c is right when he points out that the pics lack Ratchet.(I am not counting Arcee yet since I don´t think that I have enough proof of her being in the film.) And its of course also strange that just before the trailer comes out these details show up.(Yes I know, it looks very similar to my first lines but it means something different.)

Springer145 · Post by **Springer145** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:06 pm

Rattrap's tail wrote:
SPOILER! (select to read)
(I am not counting Arcee yet since I don´t think that I have enough proof of her being in the film.) And its of course also strange that just before the trailer comes out these details show up.(Yes I know, it looks very similar to my first lines but it means something different.)

SPOILER! (select to read)
What about that picture/video that surfaced quite some time ago of two or three of the young actors driving the buell (sp?) motorcycles? I was pretty sure everyone decided that was some form of Arcee - given the design of the bikes labeled by Target as Arcee (I've only seen the blue one) I would say that was her in those leaks.

secretcode · Post by **secretcode** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:23 pm

SPOILER! (select to read)
Or the comic cover with all the Autobots on it including Arcee...

S_Windell · Post by **S_Windell** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:58 am

secretcode wrote:New Images are up of the majority of the Autobots on the road.
http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/oo13 ... 00x240.jpg
http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/oo13 ... 00x225.jpg

SPOILER! (select to read)
Personally, I'm disappointed in the lack of "Arcee" and Ratchet.

SPOILER! (select to read)
I'm with you on Ratchet! My favorite Autobot from the first film and so far his role in the sequel seems even smaller.

Rattrap's tail wrote:
SPOILER! (select to read)
Hmmm That´s strange/nice. It´s nice to see that in just a week before the trailer comes out(1 february, start of the Superbowl) that we now finnally get some nice snazzy details. On the other hand, secret-c is right when he points out that the pics lack Ratchet.(I am not counting Arcee yet since I don´t think that I have enough proof of her being in the film.) And its of course also strange that just before the trailer comes out these details show up.(Yes I know, it looks very similar to my first lines but it means something different.)

SPOILER! (select to read)
I see nothing unusual about the timing. Pics of the vehicles have been seen intermittently for at least a year now, usually from non-official sources like these two seem to be.

And how much more proof do you need to think Arcee's in the film? Hasn't it been more or less confirmed?

Rattrap's tail · Post by **Rattrap's tail** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:42 pm

S_Windell wrote:
SPOILER! (select to read)
I'm with you on Ratchet! My favorite Autobot from the first film and so far his role in the sequel seems even smaller.

SPOILER! (select to read)
I see nothing unusual about the timing. Pics of the vehicles have been seen intermittently for at least a year now, usually from non-official sources like these two seem to be.

And how much more proof do you need to think Arcee's in the film? Hasn't it been more or less confirmed?

]I guess I missed out some info since I am not reading the forum of the Archive for a really long time. Thanks anyway for getting me back on trail.

borg72 · Post by **borg72** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:22 pm

SPOILER! (select to read)
kind of a re-post from the toy thread, but this picture of starscreams' new toy might warrant some discussion, when you look at the interesting paintwork...

TURBO CHARGER · Post by **TURBO CHARGER** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:30 am

SPOILER! (select to read)
I don't see how people automaticly assume from that Wal Mart video that 3 three motorcycles have no chance of bieng anything other than Arcee. It was pretty vague, all they did was ride up to the camera. What other proof is out there that its her? Toys don't really count because we all know that just because there is a toy for a character doesn't mean they have to be in the movie. Look at all the toys from the first movie that weren't actually in the movie.

Rattrap's tail · Post by **Rattrap's tail** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:41 pm

borg72 wrote:
SPOILER! (select to read)
kind of a re-post from the toy thread, but this picture of starscreams' new toy might warrant some discussion, when you look at the interesting paintwork...

SPOILER! (select to read)
Lol. Screamo has got a 4 FOR INTELLICENCE. This sure says something about the Decepticons.

Treadshot A1 · Post by **Treadshot A1** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:46 pm

Rattrap's tail wrote:
SPOILER! (select to read)
got a 4 FOR INTELLICENCE.

SPOILER! (select to read)
'G', not 'C' [/couldn't resist, soz]

I have to say that i'm just as confused as Turbo Charger. I have yet to see any proof that it has to be Arcee, and just Arcee. I'm not saying there isn't any, i'd just like someone to show me some evidence. Or at least point out a few things.

Treadshot A1 · Post by **Treadshot A1** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:50 pm

Tramp wrote:More than likely, it was that Hasbro couldn't trademark the name.

Just to further expand, they now call him Airazor, as shown in the Superion set in Universe.

I know, double post. Someone merge this with my above post, please. And delete italicized stuff!