Well,the RNC is off to a great start...
- 13thScorpio
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:17 pm
- Location: Chaotic Evil
- Springer007
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:28 pm
- Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
- Contact:
Not to my knowledge, no. It's shocking though, from what I skimmed of the article it seems the protesters associated with the violence were too cowardly to reveal their faces. That will cost that particular city money to clean up, and cause more of a police-state society due to them acting out. It's like the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) being environmentalists, yet burn down homes and car dealerships. It just hurts the anti-war/anti-violence movement for people who are the non-violent and peaceful individuals. What a sad time to live in.
"Fear denies faith. And for the Immortal Emperor!"
-Space Marines
-Space Marines
- slartibartfast
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:40 pm
- Location: paris.
- Contact:
I guess that I'm not the only one who has lost faith in the peace protests.
Besides, they could have turned up with guns if they had wanted to. It seems that most of the casualties were the result of the police.it took on more of a parade-like feel than an electricity-charged protest. Marchers sang and danced with carnival-like music in the background as they made the turn by the Xcel Energy Center and headed back to the Capitol. There were few signs of tension or anger.
Indeed, albeit perhaps more in the sense of disillusion. Would this have any effect at the RNC?Springer007 wrote:What a sad time to live in.
- Springer007
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:28 pm
- Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
- Contact:
True, could have shown up with weapons. I also feel the police are limited anymore in what they can and cannot do when it comes to protests. The whole Rodney King thing brings back bad memories of how things could have been done better, but the guy was on drugs, then the riots that followed. Two different incidents, but different outcomes in terms of collateral damage. And I doubt this will affect the RNC, they will just use it as ammo for the Democrats later on, which everyone knows sometimes these violent protesters might not be from the Left at all, and just trying to stir up trouble all-in-all.
*** This might also make the RNC the "good" guys solely because they could say these violent protests mean they are doing the "right" thing.
*** This might also make the RNC the "good" guys solely because they could say these violent protests mean they are doing the "right" thing.
"Fear denies faith. And for the Immortal Emperor!"
-Space Marines
-Space Marines
My paranoid side is tempted to agree that some of the violent protesters may well have been plants to make the rest look bad.
However, it's equally likely that U.S. left-wingers are just demonstrating their incredible ability to shoot themselves (or their cause) in the foot. Someone needs to sit a lot of them down and explain that you don't win hearts and minds by pissing people off. All this does is help make Republicans look the party of sensible, sober and safe people.
However, it's equally likely that U.S. left-wingers are just demonstrating their incredible ability to shoot themselves (or their cause) in the foot. Someone needs to sit a lot of them down and explain that you don't win hearts and minds by pissing people off. All this does is help make Republicans look the party of sensible, sober and safe people.
I should have been more clear - it provides confirmation for people who already tend to see things that way, and makes it easier for them to ignore arguments from Democrats. They're the party of crazy hippies, why should we ever listen to them, things like that.Sir Auros wrote:Not while the Jerry Fallwells* of the country are still more vocal than the fiscal conservatives.
*Yes, I know that son of a bitch is dead.
Sort of like the ELF mentioned above, or PETA. They stand for good causes, but use out-there/violent methods that they do more harm than good by giving people an excuse to ignore or disparage the cause entirely.
I knew what you meant, and I know it's an issue. I just couldn't resist.
I wonder how many of these people actually are involved with the party, though. I wouldn't be surprised if these self-described anarchists only show up to tear shit up, and if the extent of their political involvement is stuff like this.
I wonder how many of these people actually are involved with the party, though. I wouldn't be surprised if these self-described anarchists only show up to tear shit up, and if the extent of their political involvement is stuff like this.
- wolfbolt86
- Protoform
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:45 pm
About three hundred are going to court for the violent protest
Link http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/02/ ... index.html
Looks like most are getting misdemeanors, while over 100 are getting felonies.
Was there any type of protest like this one four years ago?
Link http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/02/ ... index.html
Looks like most are getting misdemeanors, while over 100 are getting felonies.
Was there any type of protest like this one four years ago?
- Galvatron91
- Posts: 8359
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 am
- Location: Keeping the world safe from crappy posts
- Springer007
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:28 pm
- Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
- Contact:
This is why I am afraid one day the right to protest peacefully will be revoked. As Mussolini once said *paraphrasing* "You will appreciate the freedoms once they are taken away from you". Sadly, he did take freedoms away from the Italian people, and he was a smart man, just not in the right ways.
"Fear denies faith. And for the Immortal Emperor!"
-Space Marines
-Space Marines
Anyone else find it odd that the same loons who preach and preach and preach about abstinence-only sex ed. are now THRILLED that the VP pick has a knocked-up teenage daughter? Is this the same party that was calling for welfare reforms to keep teenage mothers from supporting the kids said party wants to legally prevent from being aborted? I guess it's ok because they're getting married.
Never underestimate the power of rationalization when defending the people on your side. Palin's daughter is keeping the baby, the kids are getting married (hopefully that was planned before the nomination), so they can now be held up as an example of how to stick to family values despite youthful mistakes.Sir Auros wrote:Anyone else find it odd that the same loons who preach and preach and preach about abstinence-only sex ed. are now THRILLED that the VP pick has a knocked-up teenage daughter? Is this the same party that was calling for welfare reforms to keep teenage mothers from supporting the kids said party wants to legally prevent from being aborted? I guess it's ok because they're getting married.
Fun fact: I went to high school in the town where Sarah Palin was mayor and my folks still live there, so I've gotten an inside look on how this reasoning goes. She's a Real Alaska Woman(tm) and a conservative Republican who also managed to buck the establishment. No matter what screw-ups have occurred during her term as governor (or mayor), people love her because she comes off as one of them, a regular country gal standing up to slick politicians.
I'll bet the GOP is counting on this appeal to work for the rest of the country as well. She's gutsy and likable, and that's enough to compel Republican voters to righteously defend her and her family against any dirt that turns up. For all that the Dems are celebrating this as a disaster, picking her seems like it was a pretty shrewd choice.
This town?
Ugh, it sounds like she's a religious zealot's wet dream, so no wonder they can rationalize their glee for an unwed teenage mother. I guess it appeals to the pastors' sheep for McCain in a way that him stealing a story from Solzhenitsyn won't.
Ugh, it sounds like she's a religious zealot's wet dream, so no wonder they can rationalize their glee for an unwed teenage mother. I guess it appeals to the pastors' sheep for McCain in a way that him stealing a story from Solzhenitsyn won't.
She probably appeals to the more moderate Christians along with the zealous ones, since she comes across as very firm in her beliefs without being showy about it. I really hope the Democrats don't underestimate her appeal and get too comfortable.
That's the one. The slideshow accompanying that article gave me a little twinge of nostalgia when I saw it earlier. I've been trying to talk my parents into going into town to spot journalists.Sir Auros wrote:This town?
- Galvatron91
- Posts: 8359
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 am
- Location: Keeping the world safe from crappy posts